73 Bill G4WJS. We cannot expect to expand precious spectrum regardless of other users without due consideration. Putting FT8 above JT9 lands it in a popular and heavily used RTTY sub-band and increasing activity would only expand further up while leaving the JT65 sub-band under utilized. 1 Frequency XX.076 In most bands, the JT65 traffic is found at: XX.076 MHz near PSK31 andRTTY traffic 2 AGCT 80 AGCT is similar to the traditional RF gain this setting will effect the RX Gain 3Drive>30 This value is approximated to Watts. Putting FT8 in a 2 kHz sub-band below JT65 on many bands was deliberate and included the assumption that many JT65 users looking for faster QSOs with strong signals would move to FT8, this naturally allows FT8 usage to expand upwards as JT65 usage reduces. Just because you think they are wrong does not make your choices correct, nor can I find any contribution from yourself on the discussion threads about the proposed allocations for FT8 than ran for a couple of weeks before the WSJT-X RC1 beta release on the wsjt-devel SourceForge list or wsjtgroup Yahoo Groups support list. The frequencies proposed for the up coming v1.8.0 release (now in beta test) have been decided upon after consultation, review of other mode usage and band plans. It was posted to a non-official web site which we do not control.
Hi Bob, the information you posted was from a pre-release alpha test version of WSJT-X only available to those who build WSJT-X from sources and came with a strict reminder that those doing so should follow the wsjt-devel traffic and and change history for updates.
0 kommentar(er)
